Controversy over V for Vendetta

V for Vendetta is not a subtle statement. It is not delicate or restrained. On the contrary, from the very beginning of the novel the theme is quite clear. This story is a bold statement about freedom vs. fascism. While it is easy to choose a side while looking at the words, in reality the lines between the two become blurred. Where should the public’s liberties be limited? Does “safety” qualify as an acceptable excuse to take away certain freedoms? V for Vendetta addresses all of these questions through the magnetic persona known only as “V”. Although the story may seem like fiction, the threat of fascism is constant, even today.
In the aftereffects of September 11, 2001, these same questions over freedom and rights were raised just as they always are whenever controversial decisions are made regarding public policies. That is why the movie version of this novel created such a stir. At the same time average citizens were wondering whether racial profiling or the patriot act were indeed lawful, a movie was released with the underlying theme of anarchy. This novel parallels reality in so many undeniable ways it is easy to see why many individuals were uneasy when watching it. Additionally V is a terrorist. He literally incites terror into individuals. However V is supposed to be seen as the hero. I have never been one to fight fire with fire. It doesn’t seem to work and the cycle of animosity tends to continue. However the power of an idea like V ‘s in a situation as dire as Norsefire is commendable. He realizes that anarchy is only the beginning. After the chaos, growth will come.